Intuitional

Free revision notes · 21-page PDF

Hypothesis Testing Notes — JC1 H2 Math

Hypothesis testing is the capstone of the H2 statistics strand and appears in Paper 2 every year. It builds on sampling and the Normal distribution, using the distribution of the sample mean X̄ to decide, in a disciplined and quantitative way, whether a claim about a population mean μ deserves to be believed.

The calculation is almost entirely done on the GC, so marks are won and lost on language, setup and precision: choosing H₁ from the wording of the claim, justifying why a z-test is valid, and writing the conclusion in context with non-definitive language.

What these notes cover

  • •The core logic of hypothesis testing
  • •Null and alternative hypotheses
  • •One-tail and two-tail tests
  • •Test statistic, significance level and critical region
  • •The p-value and the decision rule
  • •Case 1: normal population, known variance
  • •Case 2: large sample and the Central Limit Theorem
  • •Unbiased estimates from raw and coded data
  • •The six-step test procedure
  • •Conclusion protocol and forbidden wording
  • •Critical-value method and inverse problems
  • •Common mistakes and exam technique

Key definitions

Null hypothesis, H₀
The status-quo assumption — the claim, the stated value or the previous situation — assumed true throughout the calculation. It is always an equality, H₀: μ = μ₀, never μ ≤ μ₀ or μ ≥ μ₀.
Alternative hypothesis, H₁
What is suspected to be true instead, framed from the wording of the claim in the question. It takes exactly one of three forms: μ ≠ μ₀ (two-tail), μ > μ₀ or μ < μ₀ (one-tail).
Level of significance, α
The probability of rejecting H₀ when H₀ is in fact true. Testing at the 5% level means accepting a 0.05 probability of wrongly rejecting a true null hypothesis.
Critical region
The set of values of the test statistic for which H₀ is rejected, also called the rejection region. Under H₀ its total probability is exactly α, and its boundary values are the critical values.
p-value
The probability, assuming μ = μ₀ is true, of obtaining a sample mean at least as extreme as the observed value, in the direction(s) specified by H₁. Reject H₀ if and only if p-value < α.

Key formulas

Test statistic — Case 1 (normal population, known variance)

Z=Xˉ−μ0σ/n∼N(0,1)Z = \frac{\bar{X} - \mu_0}{\sigma / \sqrt{n}} \sim \mathrm{N}(0, 1)

Under H₀: μ = μ₀. X̄ is the sample mean, σ the known population standard deviation and n the sample size. Valid for any n when the population is stated to be normal; do not cite the CLT.

Test statistic — Case 2 (large sample)

Z=Xˉ−μ0s/n∼N(0,1) approximatelyZ = \frac{\bar{X} - \mu_0}{s / \sqrt{n}} \sim \mathrm{N}(0, 1) \text{ approximately}

Used when n is large: by the Central Limit Theorem X̄ is approximately normal, and the unbiased estimate s² replaces the unknown σ². If σ is given, use it in place of s.

Unbiased estimates of μ and σ²

xˉ=∑xn,s2=1n−1(∑x2−(∑x)2n)\bar{x} = \frac{\sum x}{n}, \quad s^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\left(\sum x^2 - \frac{\left(\sum x\right)^2}{n}\right)

s² divides by n − 1, not n. On the GC's 1-Var Stats, Sx divides by n − 1 (square it to get s²); σx divides by n and is not the value wanted.

Unbiased estimates from coded data

xˉ=a+∑(x−a)n,s2=1n−1(∑(x−a)2−(∑(x−a))2n)\bar{x} = a + \frac{\sum (x-a)}{n}, \quad s^2 = \frac{1}{n-1}\left(\sum (x-a)^2 - \frac{\left(\sum (x-a)\right)^2}{n}\right)

a is the coding constant. Subtracting a constant shifts the mean but leaves the spread untouched, so a is added back for the mean only.

Critical-value decision rule (two-tail)

Reject H0 if ∣z∣>zcrit, where P(Z>zcrit)=α2\text{Reject } H_0 \text{ if } |z| > z_{\text{crit}}, \text{ where } P(Z > z_{\text{crit}}) = \tfrac{\alpha}{2}

Equivalent to rejecting H₀ when p-value < α. Critical values from invNorm: two-tail 5% ±1.9600, one-tail 5% 1.6449, two-tail 1% ±2.5758, one-tail 1% 2.3263.

Rejection region for x̄ (upper-tail test)

xˉ>μ0+zcrit⋅σn\bar{x} > \mu_0 + z_{\text{crit}} \cdot \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}

Found by unwinding the standardisation. Needed for inverse questions asking for the range of x̄, n, μ₀ or the significance level, which cannot be done by pressing Z-Test.

Worked example

A drinks bottler claims that the mean volume of cola in its bottles is 500 ml. Volumes are known to be normally distributed with standard deviation 4.2 ml. A quality auditor measures a random sample of 50 bottles and obtains a sample mean volume of 501.1 ml. Test, at the 5% level of significance, whether the mean volume differs from 500 ml. Interpret the p-value in the context of the question.

  1. 1Let X be the volume of cola, in ml, in a randomly chosen bottle and let μ be the population mean volume, with X ~ N(μ, 4.2²) and σ = 4.2 known.
  2. 2Test H₀: μ = 500 against H₁: μ ≠ 500; “differs from” questions the claim in both directions, so this is a two-tail test at the 5% level of significance.
  3. 3The population is normal, so X̄ is exactly normal and no Central Limit Theorem is needed: under H₀, X̄ ~ N(500, 4.2² ÷ 50), so Z = (X̄ − 500) ÷ (4.2 ÷ √50) ~ N(0, 1).
  4. 4With x̄ = 501.1, z = (501.1 − 500) ÷ (4.2 ÷ √50) = 1.1 ÷ 0.59397 = 1.8519 (5 s.f.).
  5. 5The test is two-tail, so p-value = 2P(Z ≥ 1.8519) = 0.0640 (3 s.f.).
  6. 6Since 0.0640 > 0.05, we do not reject H₀: there is insufficient evidence, at the 5% level of significance, that the mean volume of cola in the bottles differs from 500 ml.
  7. 7Check by rejection region: with critical values ±1.9600, H₀ is rejected when x̄ ≤ 500 − 1.9600 × 4.2 ÷ √50 = 498.84 or x̄ ≥ 500 + 1.9600 × 4.2 ÷ √50 = 501.16, and 501.1 falls just short of 501.16, giving the same conclusion.
  8. 8Interpretation: if the true mean volume were 500 ml, there would be a probability of 0.0640 of obtaining a sample mean at least as far from 500 ml as the observed 501.1 ml, in either direction.

Watch out: Never round the boundary values early: the observed 501.1 ml falls only just short of the upper boundary 501.16 ml.

Common mistakes

Saying “accept H₀”

Wrong: Since p-value = 0.251 > 0.05, we accept H₀. The mean mass is 375 g.

Right: Since p-value = 0.251 > 0.05, we do not reject H₀. There is insufficient evidence, at the 5% level of significance, that the mean mass of a packet differs from 375 g.

Choosing H₁ by looking at the sample data

Wrong: The sample mean is x̄ = 61.3 > 60, so I will test H₁: μ > 60.

Right: H₁ comes from the wording of the claim, decided before the data is examined. If a customer suspects underfilling, H₁: μ < μ₀ even if the sample mean happens to be above μ₀.

Wrong critical value for a two-tail test

Wrong: Two-tail test at the 5% level, rejecting H₀ when |z| > 1.6449.

Right: A two-tail test at the 5% level puts 2.5% in each tail, so the critical values are ±1.9600. The value 1.6449 is the one-tail 5% critical value.

Questions students ask

What is the difference between a one-tail and a two-tail hypothesis test?

If H₁ is μ ≠ μ₀ the test is two-tail, so a sample mean that is unusually large or unusually small counts as evidence against H₀. If H₁ is μ > μ₀ or μ < μ₀ the test is one-tail and only one direction counts. The direction is decided entirely by the wording of the question, such as “has changed” (two-tail) or “has increased” (one-tail, upper).

Do I need to assume the population is normal for a z-test in H2 Math?

If n is large, no assumption is needed: by the Central Limit Theorem the sample mean X̄ is approximately normal regardless of the distribution of the population. If n is small and normality is not stated, you must assume the population is normally distributed so that X̄ is normally distributed. The mark is for connecting sample size → CLT → normality of X̄.

Why can't you write “accept H₀” in a hypothesis test conclusion?

A hypothesis test never proves anything: failing to reject H₀ only means there is insufficient evidence against it, not that H₀ is true. The only permitted phrase is “do not reject H₀”, followed by a statement about the evidence at the stated level of significance, in context. Writing “accept H₀”, “H₀ is true” or “the claim is proved” is penalised every year.

How do you find the smallest level of significance at which H₀ is rejected?

H₀ is rejected when p-value < α ÷ 100, so the boundary level of significance equals the p-value expressed as a percentage. For example, a p-value of 0.028614 gives a smallest level of significance of 2.86% (3 s.f.). Do not answer 100 − 2.86 = 97.1%; a plausible significance level is typically under 10%.

In the full PDF

  • •Diagrams of the one-tail and two-tail rejection regions under the standard normal curve
  • •The wording-to-H₁ table, including how to handle “overstated” and “understated” claims
  • •The decision table for choosing Case 1 or Case 2, and when no valid test exists in 9758
  • •Further worked examples: a one-tail test on coded data at the 2% level, and inverse problems for the range of x̄ and of μ₀
  • •The remaining pitfalls: reversed inequalities in inverse problems, misusing the CLT and misinterpreting the level of significance
  • •Model answers for the assumption question, GC (TI-84) keystrokes, the exam technique checklist and the five-takeaway summary